Comparison of country performance in dimensions and indicators
Here it is possible to compare countries according to their performance in dimensions and/or indicators. To browse the full reports, please check here. A value from 0 to 3 is assigned to each country performance in each indicator, following the MDM methodology. After the table, there are additional instructions to customize the data visualization.
Country Use the box below to filter between countries |
F1 Geographic distribution of news media availability |
F2 Patterns of news media use (consumption of news) |
F3 Diversity of news sources |
F4 Internal rules for practice of newsroom democracy |
F5 Company rules against internal influence on newsroom / editorial staff |
F6 Company rules against external influence on newsroom / editorial staff |
F7 Procedures on news selection and news processing |
Freedom / Information (overall) Max. 21 points |
E1 Media ownership concentration national level |
E2 Media ownership concentration regional (local) level |
E3 Diversity of formats |
E4 Minority / Alternative media |
E5 Affordable public and private news media |
E6 Content monitoring instrument |
E7 Code of ethics at the national level (structure) |
E8 Level of self-regulation (performance) |
E9 Participation |
E10 Rules and practices on internal pluralism |
Equality / Interest mediation (overall) Max. 30 points |
C1 Supervising the watchdog ‘control of the controllers’ |
C2 Independence of the news media from power holders |
C3 Transparency of data on media system |
C4 Journalism professionalism |
C5 Journalists’ job security |
C6 Practice of access to information |
C7 The watchdog and the media’s mission statement |
C8 Professional training |
C9 Watchdog function and financial resources |
Control / Watchdog (overall) Max. 27 points |
Overall Max. 78 points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 47 |
Austria | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 44 |
Finland | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 54 |
Germany | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 56 |
Lithuania | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 44 |
The Netherlands | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 58 |
Portugal | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 49 |
Sweden | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 60 |
Switzerland | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 48 |
United Kingdom | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 56 |
Customize the data visualization
You can use the filter boxes under the column’s title to filter the data, which accepts even regular expressions.
For example, try out:
Australia OR Portugal
to select specific countries (in the first column);2
to filter by a given value (e.g. 2);1 OR 3
to filter for two values;!=3
to filter out a value (e.g. NOT 3);>2
to get values more than a minimum (e.g. more than 2);>=1
to get values more or equal a minimum (e.g. more or equal 1); and so on.You can also use multiple filters in more columns at the same time (they will behave like a logical AND
).
Drop your email to get updates about the study