Germany – (E6) Content monitoring instruments
Continuous content monitoring is regularly provided and published by independent organisations, scholars, and media organisations.
Continuous content monitoring is regularly provided and published by independent organisations, scholars, and media organisations.
On a regional level ownership concentration is remaining remarkably high. In most German regions one newspaper is dominant; the public service broadcaster still dominates the local radio market.
In most leading German news media, there exist specially trained experts to monitor misinformation. In only a few cases are algorithm-based tools used, as traditional means of fact-checking are considered more valuable.
Internal debate on news production is practised more than once every day and is part of journalistic routines.
Leading news media in Germany receive their income from diverse sources. There is no single large advertiser.
Newsroom journalists enjoy independence on editorial decisions. The management, sales department, and newsrooms are separated most of the time. Although there was one severe case of political influence in public service media, this was resolved by a constitutional court proceeding.
Newsroom democracy is established by editorial statutes, which are common in German newsrooms. But journalists have limited influence on hiring decisions for editors-in-chief.
The variety of sources in news production is restricted in the sense that non-elite discourse and diversity of the social and cultural heterogeneity of society are reflected less. Some news agencies dominate the market. Investigation is mostly conducted in special units and is limited to large flagship media outlets.
The German citizen is well supplied with news from different sources.
There is a multiplicity of news sources widely available all over the country.