Chile – (E10) Rules and practices on internal pluralism
There are no rules for internal pluralism, but there are opportunities for deliberation. In any case, in a polarised scenario, the issue of inner pluralism generates tension.
There are no rules for internal pluralism, but there are opportunities for deliberation. In any case, in a polarised scenario, the issue of inner pluralism generates tension.
There are limited instances for citizen participation in media, and editors are critical of the quality of the discussion provided by the audiences.
Internal self-regulation exists associated with a culture shared by journalists and editors within a medium, with clear dogmas, but are rarely written down.
There is more than one entity in charge of media ethics; however, they are not relevant referents for the daily exercise of journalism.
There is more than one external instance, which functions in a case-by-case manner, but media do not self-monitor permanently for the citizenship.
Subscriptions to the main printed and digital newspapers are expensive for the average salary, but the rest of the media are affordable for the people
There are media and initiatives for several specific communities, but usually they are born out of those same groups and tend to be niche.
A media landscape that achieves innovation, but it is still at an early stage as for the variety of formats and consolidation of the same.
One company dominates newspapers, but media ownership is diversified at the regional level.
Codes of ethics and guidelines mandate the inclusion of different relevant viewpoints, and some level of internal pluralism is observed in the newsroom. However, there is no methodical system in place to ensure the reflection of various voices.